Arbitration · Artificial intelligence

Artificial intelligence in arbitration.

How arbitral institutions guide the use of artificial intelligence, the principles they share, and what they mean for tribunals, parties and counsel.

Why it matters

Dispute resolution is a high-risk area.

Annex III, point 8 of the AI Act classifies as high-risk the artificial intelligence systems intended to assist judicial authorities, or used in a similar way in alternative dispute resolution. Arbitration that relies on such tools is exactly where independent assessment makes sense.

Institutional guidelines

What the institutions recommend.

April 2024

Guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence in arbitration, for all participants in the proceedings.

October 2024

Guide on the use of artificial intelligence in cases administered under the SCC rules.

March 2025, revised September 2025

Guideline on the use of artificial intelligence in arbitration, with model agreements and procedural orders.

April 2025

Note on the use of artificial intelligence in proceedings administered by VIAC.

2025

Guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence technology in arbitration.

Working group

A dedicated working group on artificial intelligence in international arbitration.

In practice: AAA-ICDR has launched an AI Arbitrator for documents-only construction cases, with every outcome validated by a human arbitrator.

Shared principles

Three principles appear everywhere.

Human oversight

Decisions remain with the tribunal; artificial intelligence may support, never replace, its judgement.

Confidentiality

Case data is processed only with tools that protect it, with the agreement of the parties.

Transparency

The use of artificial intelligence is disclosed, and its effect on the proceedings can be explained.

How we help

Both worlds, under one roof.