SVAMC
April 2024Guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence in arbitration, for all participants in the proceedings.
Arbitration · Artificial intelligence
How arbitral institutions guide the use of artificial intelligence, the principles they share, and what they mean for tribunals, parties and counsel.
Why it matters
Annex III, point 8 of the AI Act classifies as high-risk the artificial intelligence systems intended to assist judicial authorities, or used in a similar way in alternative dispute resolution. Arbitration that relies on such tools is exactly where independent assessment makes sense.
Institutional guidelines
Guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence in arbitration, for all participants in the proceedings.
Guide on the use of artificial intelligence in cases administered under the SCC rules.
Guideline on the use of artificial intelligence in arbitration, with model agreements and procedural orders.
Note on the use of artificial intelligence in proceedings administered by VIAC.
Guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence technology in arbitration.
A dedicated working group on artificial intelligence in international arbitration.
In practice: AAA-ICDR has launched an AI Arbitrator for documents-only construction cases, with every outcome validated by a human arbitrator.
Shared principles
Decisions remain with the tribunal; artificial intelligence may support, never replace, its judgement.
Case data is processed only with tools that protect it, with the agreement of the parties.
The use of artificial intelligence is disclosed, and its effect on the proceedings can be explained.
How we help
A hearing room, a protocol modelled on the CIArb guideline and tools for transcription and translation.
Plan a hearing
Independent testing and audit of the artificial intelligence systems used by tribunals, institutions and law firms.
Request an offer